I’m somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 due to the fact main-stream news have actually guaranteed really few individuals understand the information associated with the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought not to have already been arrested in britain to start with since there is no instance, with no investigation that is genuine. Check this out and also you shall understand why.
The other thing maybe perhaps not commonly recognized can there be is not any JURY in a rape test in Sweden which is a SECRET TRIAL. Most of the proof, all the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no news. Really the only public part is the charging and also the verdict. There is certainly a judge as well as 2 advisers straight appointed by governmental events. So that you never ever would get to know just just how clearly the full instance is a stitch-up. Unless you look at this.
You can find therefore numerous inconsistencies in Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. However the key question which leaps away I have not seen asked anywhere else – is this at me– and which strangely:
Why did Anna Ardin maybe not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood when you look at the Swedish team around Assange when it comes to shocking red cashmere sweater she had worn into the front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange had been intending to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a pal who had been trying to find Assange:
“He’s maybe maybe not right right here. He’s planned to own sex with all the girl that is cashmere evening, yet not managed to make it. Perhaps he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days previously, on 13 August, she was in fact intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she had been ready to decide to try (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s entire life. She has also been to mention that this attack included enforced sex that is unprotected she had been concerned with HIV.
If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced non-safe sex on the and also this may have transmitted HIV, why did she make no try to alert Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in risk of her life? And exactly why ended up being Ardin speaking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about this to buddies, without any disapproval that is evident discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information as well as had organised her enrollment for the press seminar. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Why don’t we fit that into a rather brief survey regarding the entire Ardin/Assange relationship.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for the press seminar organised by a branch of this Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat as she will be away for him to stay in.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s got supper with Assange and additionally they have consensual intercourse, from the day that is first of. Ardin afterwards alleges this changed into assault by surreptitious mutilation of this condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to do something as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him in the dais at their press conference. Assange satisfies Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to head to a crayfish party, anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This try to look for a party that is crayfish, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early early morning. Another provides to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick with me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless during the crayfish party with Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting out-of-doors at 02:00 and scarcely freezing with all the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, in accordance with both their authorities testimonies, rest once again in identical single sleep, and continue doing therefore for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have intercourse; Anna tells police they cannot. That Anna and Julian go together to, and leave together from, a dinner with the leadership of the Pirate Party evening. They again sleep within the bed that is same.
16 August: Julian would go to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin will not warn her of possible intimate attack. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once again declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say this woman is focused on STD’s including HIV after non-safe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague on a single ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to simply simply take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s that is unrecorded breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration accusing Assange of rape. Wilen will not signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own police declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had sex that is unprotected her eight times formerly.
Some times later on: Ardin produces a broken condom towards the authorities as proof; but a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA upon it, and even it’s evidently live sex chat unused.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s Ardin-arranged meeting with Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead not to ever whine of a assault, but check into STDs. Wilen refused to signal the declaration alleging rape, that has been used by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
It is simple that certain of a couple of things took place:
Ardin ended up being intimately assaulted with non-safe sex, but did not warn Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in general general public and personal with him, behave as his press assistant, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated provides to accommodate him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him making use of her one sleep flat while she had been away. By her very own admission, she had consensual intercourse with him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and seems at the very least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after unsafe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning feminist buddy, policewoman Irmeli Krans, to be able to twist Wilen’s tale right into a sexual assault – very easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape regulations. Wilen refused to sign.
During the police section on 20 August, Wilen texted a pal at 14.25 “did not require to place any charges against JA nevertheless the police desired to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted because I only wanted him to take a test” that she was “shocked when they arrested JA.
The next night at 22.22 she texted “it had been the authorities who fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then composed her story that is own of attack. As numerous buddies knew she had been making love with Assange, she could maybe maybe maybe not claim sex that is non-consensual. So she manufactured her story to squeeze in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event associated with torn condom. However the torn condom she produced doesn’t have trace of Assange onto it. It really is impractical to wear a condom rather than keep a DNA trace.
We have no difficulty in stating that We securely think Ardin to become a liar. On her behalf tale to be real involves acceptance of behaviour that is, into the sense that is literal amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say incredibly poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never ever likely to see all this work detail. Rape trials in Sweden take place completely in key. There is absolutely no jury, as well as the national government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. If Assange would go to Sweden, he can disappear completely into prison, the test is supposed to be key, in addition to the next thing you will definitely hear is the fact that he could be bad and a rapist.
Next, needless to say, no matter the data is indeed weak, as in order to cry rape would be to tarnish a man’s reputation forever. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in ruining a lot of the work and life of Assange. The important points for the tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line it is incorrect also to consider evidence. That she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro groups in Havana and Miami if you are not allowed to know who the accuser is, how can you find out?
Finally, to those of good use idiots whom declare that how you can test these things is with in court, i might say needless to say, you might be appropriate, we ought to trust hawaii constantly, fit-ups never happen, and we also should positively condemn the disgraceful behavior of the whom campaigned for the Birmingham Six.